When large-scale flash storage first came to the consumer market as an alternative to conventional hard drives, the biggest concern (aside from price) was longevity. Tech fans had a pretty good idea of the general reliability of hard drives, but solid-state drives (SSDs) were still something of a wild card.
SSD Lifespan Basics
How Long Do SSDs Last?
Studies on SSD Lifespan
Why You Don't Need to Worry
SSD Lifespan Basics
Now, the market for SSDs has matured considerably, and we have a lot more data on… well, data. The good news is that SSDs have proven to be extremely reliable and certainly at least as good as hard drives in terms of data retention and failure rates. The bad news is that SSDs tend to fail more often with age—and not with extended data reading and writing, as formerly predicted.
That means that you’re no more likely to lose data with an all-flash setup versus a standard hard drive, but it’s still essential to keep a backup of important files.
Before we go on to some of the testing, it’s important to get a quick primer on some of the more technical terms associated with SSDs:
- MLC and SLC: Multi-Level Cell memory is cheaper and slower, generally found on consumer-grade SSD drives. Single-Level Cell memory in enterprise and enthusiast-grade SSDs is faster and technically less prone to data loss.
- Memory Block: A portion of the physical memory on a flash drive. A “bad block” is inaccessible or poorly accessible to your computer, causing a lower-than-reported level of available storage and potential read and write errors for files and software.
- TBW: Terabytes Written. The total amount of data written and re-written to a drive over its lifetime, expressed in terabytes.
With that in mind, let’s answer this question.
How Long Do SSDs Last?
Your typical SSD will survive many years of typical home use before it is at a considerable risk of failure. Exactly how long it’ll last depends largely on how much data is written to the drive, as well as the drive’s age and the ambient conditions. Anecdotally, asking around the How-to Geek office, none of us have ever had an SSD die on us — and we’re putting way more miles on our computer components than the average person is. But besides anecdotes, what does the data say about how long your fancy new SSD will last?
SSD vendors tend to rate the reliability of their drives on three factors: standard age (like any warranty), total terabytes written over time, and the amount of data written to the drive per specific amount of time, like a day. Obviously measuring by these three different standards will return different results based on methodology. And the very fact that there are three extremely loose standards for “wear” on a digital component should illustrate something to the end user: accurately predicting how long it will take a specific SSD to fail is more or less impossible. We can only give a very vague point of maximum possible data retention, after which using the drive will put you in danger of immediate loss of data and computer operation.
You can check your SSD’s health with an app like CrystalDiskInfo. An app like this one will show you the total writes made to your drive in its life and give you an idea of how close you are to the manufacturer’s TBW (Terabytes Written) rating for the solid-state drive.
RELATED: How to Check Your Hard Drive or SSD's Health With S.M.A.R.T.
Studies on SSD Lifespan
There have been several studies trying to determine a more precise lifespan for solid-state memory. A few of the more well-known ones include:
A joint study between Google and the University of Toronto covering drive failure rates on data servers. The study concluded that the physical age of the SSD, rather than the amount or frequency of data written, is the prime determiner in probability of data retention errors. It also determined that SSD drives were replaced at Google data centers far less often than conventional hard drives, at about a one-to-four ratio. But it wasn’t all positive in favor of SSDs: they experienced higher uncorrectable errors and bad blocks at a much higher rate than hard drives over the four-year testing period. Conclusion: in a high-stress, fast-read environment, SSDs will last longer than hard drives, but be more susceptible to non-catastrophic data errors. Older SSDs are more prone to total failure regardless of TBW or DWPD.
The Tech Report’s study on longevity between major brands. Among six brands of SSDs tested, only the Kingston, Samsung, and Corsair high-end drives managed to survive after writing over 1000 terabytes of data (one petabyte). The other drives failed at between 700 and 900 TBW. Two of the failed drives, Samsung and Intel, used the cheaper MLC standard, while the Kingston drive is actually the same model as the one that survived, only tested with a similar methodology. Conclusion: a ~250GB SSD can be expected to die sometime before one petabyte written — though two (or perhaps three) of the models exceeded that mark, it would be wise to plan a contingency in case your specific drive under-performs, even if it uses more expensive SLC memory.
Larger capacity SSDs, due to having more available sectors and more “room” to use before failing, should last longer in a predictable manner. For example, if a 250GB Samsung 840 MLC drive failed at 900 TBW, it would be reasonable to expect a 1TB drive to last for considerably longer, if not necessarily all the way to a massive 3.6 petabytes written.
Facebook publicly published an internal study (PDF link) of the lifespan of SSDs used in its corporate data centers. The findings were focused on the environmental conditions of the data centers themselves — for example, they came to the fairly obvious conclusion that extended proximity to high heat was damaging to an SSD’s lifespan. But the study also found that if an SSD doesn’t fail after its first major detectable errors, then it’s likely to last far longer than overly cautious software diagnostic software. Contradicting Google’s joint study, Facebook found that higher data write and read rates can significantly impact the lifespan of a drive, though it isn’t clear if the latter was controlling for the physical age of the drive itself. Conclusion: Except in cases of early total failure, SSDs are likely to last longer than indicated by early errors, and data vectors like TDW are likely to be overstated by software measurement because of system-level buffering.
Of course, all of those studies are looking at intense datacenter applications. The average home user won’t come anywhere close to that kind of utilization.
Backblaze, a cloud storage and computer backup company, has been performing a study comparing SSDs and HDDs as boot drives for their servers. It is closer to the stress an average user might put on their drives. Their study is simple: How many boot drives die per year? What is the annualized failure rate of HDDs vs. SSDs? Conclusion: HDDs and SSDs will die at a similar rate for the first 3 years of operation, but after that, the failure rate of HDDs begins to rapidly increase, whereas the failure rate of SSDs remains fairly constant for at least 5 years. Whether or not SSDs will hit a “failure wall,” an age where many drives begin to spontaneously fail is not clear yet, however you can likely count on your drive working for at least 5 years.
Why You Don’t Need to Worry
Taking all of this data in at once, what overall conclusion can we draw? Looking at these studies consecutively, you might be concerned that your SSD will burst into flames after a year or two. But keep in mind, two of the studies were on enterprise-class data centers, reading and writing data more or less constantly every day for years, and the consumer-oriented study was done specifically to stress test drives with constant use. In order to reach a petabyte of total written data, the average consumer would have to use his or her computer more or less nonstop for a decade, maybe even multiple decades. Even gamers or “power users” will probably never reach the stated maximum amount of data written for a drive under its warranty. The Backblaze analysis, which is closer to normal use, paints a more optimistic picture — most of their drives are doing just fine after five years of use in a professional environment.
In other words: You’ll probably upgrade your entire computer before your SSD fails.
Now, it’s still possible for your SSD’s electronic components to fail, just like any computer part. And the likelihood of your SSD experiencing a data retention failure does go up the longer it’s used. Since that’s true, it’s always wise to keep your critical data backed up to an external drive and (if possible) to a remote location as well. Just remember to plug your SSD in regularly if you’re using it for long-term storage. But if you’re worried about your SSD failing at any moment or being less reliable than your trusty old hard drive: don’t.
- › How to Check Your Hard Drive or SSD’s Health With S.M.A.R.T.
- › How to Create a Swap File on Linux
- › Memristors Were Going to Replace RAM and SSDs. What Happened?
- › The Best Internal SSDs of 2023
- › The Best External Solid State Drives of 2023
- › How Long Do USB Thumb Drives Hold Data?
- › Is SSD Wear an Issue With the PlayStation 5?
- › 5 Google Maps Scams (And How to Avoid Them)