Sometimes the most elementary of questions yield teachable moments; read on as we delve into how a single digit change between to offers a chance to look at network topology.

Today’s Question & Answer session comes to us courtesy of SuperUser—a subdivision of Stack Exchange, a community-driven grouping of Q&A web sites.

The Question

SuperUser reader Disa is curious about loopback IPs:

I know that both are loopback IPs, but they have another ip mask.

What’s the difference between them? Can they be used interchangeably?


IPv4 routes
Active routes:
Destination               Mask          Gateway        Interface Metric     26
[...]         On-link    306         On-link    306

What kind of information can we tease out from this table?

The Answer

Two SuperUser contributors jumped in to help solve the mystery. First, Mmmc offers this succinct overview:

No. You cannot use them both. And they are not both loopback adresses. is a loopback address is a loopback address is a loopback address and so on is a network address. Together with mask it gives you a hint that whole class A of addresses starting with 127.*.*.* will contain loopback addresses.

Then, YLearn offers a broader overview of naming conventions in general and how to think about them:

What is shown in the screenshot is a routing table from a computer. The routing table is just a “roadmap” that tells a computer/router where to go to get to other devices on the network.

In some ways this is similar to how we navigate in real life.

The first column provides the list of known destinations (where can I go) and the second column indicates how specific the destination (I can go to Canada or I can go to Uncle John’s house in Canada). Without getting into great detail, the “higher” the mask value, the more specific the destination. So a value of covers going to any device and a value of specifies an individual device.

The third column specifies where traffic should go next to get to the destination (if you are going to Canada, you need to start by getting on Main Street) and the fourth column indicates which path out of the device should be used to get to the destination (from home you may only have your driveway but from the Walmart parking lot you may have several “exits” to choose from).

Finally, the metric gives the computer a way to choose the best path if there are multiple routes to the destination (you can go out either the north or east exit from the parking lot to get to Canada, but the east one is a faster).

So to answer the original question, no you can’t use and interchangeably. The difference shown here is that there exists two routes – a general route to any device using 127.x.y.z and a very specific route to host (which is in, both of which use the interface


Have something to add to the explanation? Sound off in the the comments. Want to read more answers from other tech-savvy Stack Exchange users? Check out the full discussion thread here.

Profile Photo for Jason Fitzpatrick Jason Fitzpatrick
Jason Fitzpatrick is the Senior Smart Home Editor at How-To Geek. He has over a decade of experience in publishing and has authored thousands of articles at How-To Geek, Review Geek, LifeSavvy, and Lifehacker. Jason served as Lifehacker's Weekend Editor before he joined How-To Geek.
Read Full Bio »