<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disable User Account Control (UAC) the Easy Way on Win 7 or Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>Computer Help from your Friendly How-To Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:23:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grady</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-4/#comment-79451</link>
		<dc:creator>Grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-79451</guid>
		<description>If Microsoft wanted UAC to be more effective, they could have done like most firewalls do. Ask you once to approve a program, take a checksum, then ignore that file name with that checksum. That would cause users far less grief, and make them suspicious if they were asked about the same file again. But no, they ask you about the same file over and over again, until you just click yes every time without looking. I bought a copy of XP for a computer that came with Vista a year or so ago, after a couple of days of frustration of trying to get MySQL working. Now I am about to turn off UAC on a new computer with Vista for the same reason. UAC makes Vista more secure? I don&#039;t think so, if it annoys you daily so much you have to turn off UAC.  I have been searching the web for solutions but all I find are other people with my same frustrations. I recently installed Apache, PHP, and MySQL in Linux, which is more secure than Windows, with no frustration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft wanted UAC to be more effective, they could have done like most firewalls do. Ask you once to approve a program, take a checksum, then ignore that file name with that checksum. That would cause users far less grief, and make them suspicious if they were asked about the same file again. But no, they ask you about the same file over and over again, until you just click yes every time without looking. I bought a copy of XP for a computer that came with Vista a year or so ago, after a couple of days of frustration of trying to get MySQL working. Now I am about to turn off UAC on a new computer with Vista for the same reason. UAC makes Vista more secure? I don&#8217;t think so, if it annoys you daily so much you have to turn off UAC.  I have been searching the web for solutions but all I find are other people with my same frustrations. I recently installed Apache, PHP, and MySQL in Linux, which is more secure than Windows, with no frustration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead End Both Ways</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-4/#comment-78630</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead End Both Ways</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-78630</guid>
		<description>We have been writing an application for windows Vista and runs nicely on anything pre vista. On Vista, the program cannot read or write from its own folders. We have done everything thats suggestd by MS including adding manifests etc. It just wont work. Anyone who can point us to anywhere for a surefire solution, please help. This is getting annoying. For now we have no choice to ask ppl to turn off UAC. We could do it ourselved by reg fix but we are not keen on that. Thanks in advance. BIG THANKS TO MS for confusing and useless info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been writing an application for windows Vista and runs nicely on anything pre vista. On Vista, the program cannot read or write from its own folders. We have done everything thats suggestd by MS including adding manifests etc. It just wont work. Anyone who can point us to anywhere for a surefire solution, please help. This is getting annoying. For now we have no choice to ask ppl to turn off UAC. We could do it ourselved by reg fix but we are not keen on that. Thanks in advance. BIG THANKS TO MS for confusing and useless info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sepecat</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-4/#comment-78357</link>
		<dc:creator>sepecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-78357</guid>
		<description>Oops, my comment about no privilege elevation existing for OSX/Linux isn&#039;t accurate- you&#039;re just much less likely to run into it.  That would be /etc/sudoers :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, my comment about no privilege elevation existing for OSX/Linux isn&#8217;t accurate- you&#8217;re just much less likely to run into it.  That would be /etc/sudoers <img src='http://www.howtogeek.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sepecat</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-4/#comment-78356</link>
		<dc:creator>sepecat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-78356</guid>
		<description>For those who wonder why UAC came about for Windows when nothing similar is required for OSX/Linux:

Those two OSes have the benefit of inheriting the UNIX-style security model from their inception, where all but a select few programs are designed to run within the security confines of the user who launched them.  The first versions of Windows didn&#039;t support running processes in a separate &#039;user space&#039; which didn&#039;t have direct access to hardware and other resources.

Since MS usually puts a big effort into backwards compatibility so people can still use the large existing software base when they upgrade, no attempt was made to block programs from elevating their permissions if needed (later versions allow enforcing this via policies like Hayu mentioned).  In turn, most developers didn&#039;t feel the need to code their apps without requiring elevated access.

So, UAC comes along and many more programs trigger it than they should, because they&#039;re not coded properly.  Such a program in OSX/Linux flat out wouldn&#039;t run unless you&#039;re a super-user because no such elevation mechanism exists.  This should change over the next few years- MS might decide to run old apps (or maybe all apps) in a complete VM sandbox (parts of the machine are already virtualized for all processes) since we&#039;re at the point where even the lowliest hardware can handle it.  I&#039;m guessing this is what happens when you run a Classic MacOS program in OSX, for example.

Hope that&#039;s been of interest to some!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who wonder why UAC came about for Windows when nothing similar is required for OSX/Linux:</p>
<p>Those two OSes have the benefit of inheriting the UNIX-style security model from their inception, where all but a select few programs are designed to run within the security confines of the user who launched them.  The first versions of Windows didn&#8217;t support running processes in a separate &#8216;user space&#8217; which didn&#8217;t have direct access to hardware and other resources.</p>
<p>Since MS usually puts a big effort into backwards compatibility so people can still use the large existing software base when they upgrade, no attempt was made to block programs from elevating their permissions if needed (later versions allow enforcing this via policies like Hayu mentioned).  In turn, most developers didn&#8217;t feel the need to code their apps without requiring elevated access.</p>
<p>So, UAC comes along and many more programs trigger it than they should, because they&#8217;re not coded properly.  Such a program in OSX/Linux flat out wouldn&#8217;t run unless you&#8217;re a super-user because no such elevation mechanism exists.  This should change over the next few years- MS might decide to run old apps (or maybe all apps) in a complete VM sandbox (parts of the machine are already virtualized for all processes) since we&#8217;re at the point where even the lowliest hardware can handle it.  I&#8217;m guessing this is what happens when you run a Classic MacOS program in OSX, for example.</p>
<p>Hope that&#8217;s been of interest to some!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-3/#comment-77552</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-77552</guid>
		<description>The fact of the matter is there are a few points which illustrate why UAC is bad:

-&quot;Average users&quot; end up just clicking Allow/Continue all the time anyway, which defeats the purpose when something bad comes along

-If your system is already compromised (the only way an unauthorized program would even get to the point of asking you to allow or continue, then there&#039;s probably already a loss of security integrity on the system.  Yes this may prevent it from getting worse, but I personally wouldn&#039;t feel comfortable until formatting/reinstalling.  This from a user who installed Vista SP2 and disabled UAC and Windows Defender on Day 1 and have never had a security problem on my PC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact of the matter is there are a few points which illustrate why UAC is bad:</p>
<p>-&#8221;Average users&#8221; end up just clicking Allow/Continue all the time anyway, which defeats the purpose when something bad comes along</p>
<p>-If your system is already compromised (the only way an unauthorized program would even get to the point of asking you to allow or continue, then there&#8217;s probably already a loss of security integrity on the system.  Yes this may prevent it from getting worse, but I personally wouldn&#8217;t feel comfortable until formatting/reinstalling.  This from a user who installed Vista SP2 and disabled UAC and Windows Defender on Day 1 and have never had a security problem on my PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ktm1</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-3/#comment-76815</link>
		<dc:creator>ktm1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-76815</guid>
		<description>I just bought a new notebook with vista home edition pre-installed and followed these instructions to stop UAC.

When the notebook rebooted after turning off UAC, a lot of important services had also been automatically disabled by Vista. This included ones necessary for the wifi to work, my McAfee scanner to automatically start, etc. Even the appearance had changed because services allowing the standard vista theme had been disabled.

I tried to just turn UAC and the Security Center back on, to reverse the change - after the reboot, all the services remained disabled but now I got the annoying UAC nag every time I tried to do something as well.

I ended up having to manually enable all the services that had been disabled, trying to figure out which ones should be automatic, which ones had to be started (not just made automatic and then come on with the reboot), which ones were dependant on other ones so that they could be started in the correct sequence.

Maybe this is a &quot;feature&quot; from Microsoft so that normal users can&#039;t hurt themselves by being online with UAC disabled, and maybe this is specific to new releases of Vista Home (everyone else on this thread seemed happy with the instructions), but it was damned annoying whatever it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought a new notebook with vista home edition pre-installed and followed these instructions to stop UAC.</p>
<p>When the notebook rebooted after turning off UAC, a lot of important services had also been automatically disabled by Vista. This included ones necessary for the wifi to work, my McAfee scanner to automatically start, etc. Even the appearance had changed because services allowing the standard vista theme had been disabled.</p>
<p>I tried to just turn UAC and the Security Center back on, to reverse the change &#8211; after the reboot, all the services remained disabled but now I got the annoying UAC nag every time I tried to do something as well.</p>
<p>I ended up having to manually enable all the services that had been disabled, trying to figure out which ones should be automatic, which ones had to be started (not just made automatic and then come on with the reboot), which ones were dependant on other ones so that they could be started in the correct sequence.</p>
<p>Maybe this is a &#8220;feature&#8221; from Microsoft so that normal users can&#8217;t hurt themselves by being online with UAC disabled, and maybe this is specific to new releases of Vista Home (everyone else on this thread seemed happy with the instructions), but it was damned annoying whatever it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gonz0</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-3/#comment-76725</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonz0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-76725</guid>
		<description>...and Linux users don&#039;t have to think about security or deal with nagging popups that remind the user just how insecure their operating system really is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and Linux users don&#8217;t have to think about security or deal with nagging popups that remind the user just how insecure their operating system really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsuck</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-3/#comment-76231</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 05:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-76231</guid>
		<description>Putting the slider does not disable it completely. It just says do not notify me. I am having issues with programs not performing correctly until I select &#039;run as administrator&#039;. I am already an administrator and my slider is at the bottom.

What we need is the ability to disable it COMPLETELY, not make it silent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putting the slider does not disable it completely. It just says do not notify me. I am having issues with programs not performing correctly until I select &#8216;run as administrator&#8217;. I am already an administrator and my slider is at the bottom.</p>
<p>What we need is the ability to disable it COMPLETELY, not make it silent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-3/#comment-75932</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-75932</guid>
		<description>Those notifications are friggin&#039; ANNOYING. I just turned mine off. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those notifications are friggin&#8217; ANNOYING. I just turned mine off. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/comment-page-3/#comment-75446</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/windows-vista/disable-user-account-control-uac-the-easy-way-on-windows-vista/#comment-75446</guid>
		<description>I completely and utterly agree with everyone here who has called the UAC a joke.  I have disabled mine for the following reason:  Besides the annoyance, it allows a standard user to open mmc, regedit, services, et. al. without ANY prompt and an administrator can&#039;t even look at the UAC setting without confirming credentials!!!  Why does an administrator have to confirm credentials to open a regedit or mmc session while a standard user gets no prompt?!?!?

BTW, I have Vista Home Premium 64-bit SP1 *ONLY* because Dell did not give me any other option.  Another brilliant POS version of Microsnot Winblows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely and utterly agree with everyone here who has called the UAC a joke.  I have disabled mine for the following reason:  Besides the annoyance, it allows a standard user to open mmc, regedit, services, et. al. without ANY prompt and an administrator can&#8217;t even look at the UAC setting without confirming credentials!!!  Why does an administrator have to confirm credentials to open a regedit or mmc session while a standard user gets no prompt?!?!?</p>
<p>BTW, I have Vista Home Premium 64-bit SP1 *ONLY* because Dell did not give me any other option.  Another brilliant POS version of Microsnot Winblows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.132 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2009-11-21 23:21:40 -->
