<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week in Geek: The Happy Father&#8217;s Day Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/</link>
	<description>Computer Help from your Friendly How-To Geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:04:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-73572</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/#comment-73572</guid>
		<description>@The Geek

Ahh, I see now.  I&#039;m still using WinXP, for which there are no major upgrades any longer, so that problem never occurred to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@The Geek</p>
<p>Ahh, I see now.  I&#8217;m still using WinXP, for which there are no major upgrades any longer, so that problem never occurred to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Geek</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-73565</link>
		<dc:creator>The Geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/#comment-73565</guid>
		<description>@Jonathon

With the hacked patch files, you have to re-patch every time there&#039;s a major Windows update... which usually means you can&#039;t install any updates until there&#039;s a new patch file out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathon</p>
<p>With the hacked patch files, you have to re-patch every time there&#8217;s a major Windows update&#8230; which usually means you can&#8217;t install any updates until there&#8217;s a new patch file out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-73563</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/1875/week-in-geek-the-happy-fathers-day-edition/#comment-73563</guid>
		<description>Why would someone prefer installing a service that runs in the background all the time (even if it does use few resources) to simply patching a file?  

Not to be a Negative Nancy, just wondering if there&#039;s some benefit I&#039;m missing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would someone prefer installing a service that runs in the background all the time (even if it does use few resources) to simply patching a file?  </p>
<p>Not to be a Negative Nancy, just wondering if there&#8217;s some benefit I&#8217;m missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
