SEARCH

The How-To Geek Forums Have Migrated to Discourse

How-To Geek Forums / Build Your Own PC

Suggestions for new computer

(7 posts)
  • Started 5 years ago by xDimMaK
  • Latest reply from xDimMaK
  • Topic Viewed 755 times

xDimMaK
Posts: 2

I'm going to be building my first computer this summer, so any comments or suggestions from the more experienced would be much appreciated. The computer will be used primarily for gaming, and I'm trying to keep it in the $1000 - $1500 range (preferably closer to $1000).

Here's the current components I'm looking at (newegg prices listed in parentheses):
GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3P LGA 775 Intel P45 ATX Intel Motherboard ($134.99)

EVGA 896-P3-1255-AR GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 896MB 448-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Supported Video Card ($209.99)

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz LGA 775 Quad-Core Processor Model BX80562Q6600 ($199.99)

G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ ($39.99)

Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeGamer 7.1 Channels PCI Interface Sound Card ($75.99)

PC Power & Cooling S75QB 750W ATX12V / EPS12V SLI NVIDIA SLI Certified (Dual 8800 GTX and below) CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS Certified Active PFC Power Supply ($124.99)

LG Black Blu-ray/HD DVD-ROM & 16X DVD±R DVD Burner SATA Model GGC-H20L ($109.99)

Western Digital Caviar SE16 WD6400AAKS 640GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive ($74.99)

Antec Nine Hundred Two Black Steel ATX Mid Tower Computer Case ($159.99, though I can get it as much as $50 cheaper elsewhere)

Planning to overclock so I'm buying a Thermalright ultra 120 extreme rather than using the processor's stock heatsink.

The sound card may be a bit overkill considering I won't be using a surround sound system (just two speakers or my cheap headset). I just heard that having a dedicated sound card can noticeably improve game performance over using the onboard audio, so if anyone can recommend a cheaper yet functional alternative that'd be great.

I considered running two GTX 260's in SLI but judging from the reviews with a single card playing Crysis on very high with playable frame rates, I thought that may have been overkill as well. And I don't want to push my luck with overheating more than I already am by overclocking a quad-core on air cooling.

And it'll be running Vista x64, if that makes any difference (I've had trouble finding drivers for 64-bit operating systems in the past, but I'd think that should be much less of a problem by now).

So, anywhere I can save money and/or improve performance? Anything I should be aware of? Thanks for the help in advance, and sorry if I messed up any of those links.

Posted 5 years ago
Top
 
raijin
Posts: 54

Depending on your location there might be a better processor you can get for cheaper hmm let me find the link

Posted 5 years ago
Top
 
raijin
Posts: 54

Here's the Q9400 Q9400 $180

and here's the Q9300 Q9300 $109

I think those deals are pickup only deals, so you might want to check if there's a store near you. Edit: Holy **** is that price for the Q9300 real . . . after I originally posted this I noticed that the Q9300 price had dropped off about 70 dollars since the last time i checked this site.

Posted 5 years ago
Top
 
whs
whs
Posts: 17584

But the Q6600 is very good for overclocking - I have seen up to 3.4GHz on air.

Posted 5 years ago
Top
 
raphoenix
raphoenix
Posts: 14920

Times are rough and inventories are high with outdated products.
Should shortly see lower hardware prices I expect.
Regards,
Rick P.

Posted 5 years ago
Top
 
ScottW
ScottW
Posts: 6609

I agree with raijin -- get a newer 45nm processor if you are looking at a Core 2 Quad. The Q9400 and Q8300 are good. These 45nm chips require less power, less cooling, and can still be overclocked. The Q6600 is pretty much deprecated.

You could also go to a Core 2 Duo which consumes less power and has a higher base clock rate already. For games that don't use all 4 cores of a C2Q, a C2D at a higher clock rate might be better. A good choice here is the E8500 which is also on 45 nm, runs at 3.16 GHz and can still be overclocked.

All other parts look good to me. I think that any reduction in cost would also reduce the performance.

Posted 5 years ago
Top
 
xDimMaK
Posts: 2

Alright sounds good to me. I stayed under my budget well enough that I'll just bump the processor up to a Q9650 and get faster RAM so I can overclock higher than 3.6 GHz (I hear people have been achieving a stable 4.0 - 4.2 GHz on air cooling with that one). Thanks everyone!

Posted 5 years ago
Top
 



Topic Closed

This topic has been closed to new replies.

Get Free Articles in Your Inbox!

Join 134,000 newsletter readers

Email:

Go check your email!