Subscribe to How-To Geek

Welcome to the How-To Geek Forums

We encourage you to register on our forums and post any questions you might have. The How-To Geeks monitor this forum and will respond to your question quickly.

How-To Geek Forums » Geek Stuff

IE7Pro

(31 posts)
  • Started 7 months ago by BobJam
  • Latest reply from Justin
  • Topic Viewed 1692 times

BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

While I'm not about to switch from FF as my default browser back to IE just yet, this IE7Pro Plug In is pretty slick (I'm doing this post from IE right now).

One of the biggest headaches I always had was losing text in a post because I got sidetracked in the thread and clicked on a link and lost the posting site window. Sometimes I could recover it if I used the back button right away, but more often than not I lost it. That was particularly bothersome if I had already composed part of a lengthy post (this is where ScottW will make a wisecrack). Another solution besides trying the "Back" button real fast was using Notepad to compose and then cut and paste into a posting window, but I didn't always do that . . . especially when I thought a post was going to be brief and then it turned into something longer (insert ScottW wisecrack again). And a Ctrl-Click on the link would open it in a new tab, but I didn't always remember to do that.

FF's Tab Mix Plus solved that problem. And Opera has a "Protect" capability for tabs, and that worked too, though Tab Mix Plus has an option to always open in new tabs from anywhere, even inside a thread, so that pretty much did it for me "automagically"

Now I see this IE7Pro thing has a feature called "Text Saver" and that saves text in a posting window even if you leave the posting window so that solves the issue too . . . and pretty much makes "protecting" tabs for that purpose irrelevant.

The "Grab and Drag" feature of this thing is pretty slick too.

Am just now starting to play around with it, so I'm sure I'll find other features I like. So far though, this Plug In is like putting IE on steroids.

Nevertheless, as I said in the opening, I'm not about to switch back to IE as my default . . . yet anyway. The security features of FF, particular NoScript and the fact that FF doesn't use ActiveX, still make it more secure than IE . . . IMHO anyway.

But this IE7Pro thing is nice.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
ScottW
ScottW
Posts: 6609

Hey! I resemble that remark!

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

C'mon . . . you can do better than that for a wisecrack!

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
ScottW
ScottW
Posts: 6609

IE7Pro sounds great, Bob. Is there a plug-in that will make your posts shorter?

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
Aleeve
Aleeve
Posts: 2782

I actually laughed out loud at that one ScottW

Bob was right - you CAN do better than that for a wisecrack =)

EDIT:

Mind you, IE on steroids does sound pretty scary....


Couldn't resist a bit of photoshopping to do the second one, sorry - was bored!

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

That was better, ScottW. Closer to what I'd expect of you. Good one.

Hey Alleve,

Did you make that first graphic, or did you find it made up somewhere already?

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
Aleeve
Aleeve
Posts: 2782

Unfortunately, the first one was not me.
That's the good one!

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

Hey Aleeve,

On the second one . . . your own design . . . could you make it with the IE symbol darker, and perhaps even an IE7Pro symbol?

The reason I would like to use something like that is because on another forum I know a guy who raves more than I have about IE7Pro. And I also exchange pokes with him because I'm an FF user and he is one of those died-in-the-wool IE users who insists that FF is just for "pimply faced geeks".

I recently posted a FF logo for him adjusted to show the fox eating IE:

(Not of my own design . . . I found it somewhere . . . actually, now that I think of it, I think I got it here where somebody has it as their avatar)

Got to learn how to manipulate graphics like you do . . . is much more fun when you can "customize" them to suit your own need.

I'm still toying around with GIMP, but you clearly have skill in these things.

TIA

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
ScottW
ScottW
Posts: 6609

Bob, I've heard of this IE thing. It runs in a Firefox tab and should only be used to view pages that violate web standards. I can't imagine why that guy you know in another forum would do all of his browsing out of a Firefox tab.

The study I read about IE and FF users concludes that, "Firefox users are more likely to be tech-savvy..." and "... Firefox users are more likely to be better-educated or are seeking to be better educated." There is nothing in the report about how acne relates to browser use. I think it's unlikely that there is a causal link there!

Oh, yeah, from part 1 of the same study, Firefox users have higher incomes. However, that could be because FF users are smarter and better educated.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

Hey ScottW,

Oh boy . . . I'm going to use part of your post and "escalate" the browser wars with this guy. So far it's been friendly pokes back and forth, but this one may push him over the edge. Can't resist though . . . you've given me some good material.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
Aleeve
Aleeve
Posts: 2782

Bob
What you asked for would/could be very easily done!

Would you like me to find an IE7Pro logo and overlay it, slightly darker than the one I posted here?

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
ScottW
ScottW
Posts: 6609

Bob, sounds like fun! If your little browser war gets interesting, you will have to give us a link so we can watch from the sidelines.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

Hey Aleeve,

Here's the logo:

Have at it . . . no rush . . . at your leisure. TIA.

Hey ScottW,

There are several threads where we're sparring back and forth.

Here's the one where he started the browser wars and made this comment:

"I hate Firefox as it is a browser for kiddies that like cartoony icons, little red foxes that like to eat chickens and pimply faced geeks that think they know everything."

Scroll about a third of the way down and you'll see it.

The guys screen name is "YoKenny".

And here's my thread on IE7Pro where actually several FF folks have jabbed YoKenny . . . not just me.

And here's another good one. Scroll down just a little and you'll see my exchange with YoKenny.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
Aleeve
Aleeve
Posts: 2782

I'll try and find some time to do it tomorrow
For the time being, I'm off to bed!

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
whs
whs
Posts: 10183

Isn't it simple - you use what you like best. No need for a war. I have been using a whole array of browsers (I think 8 or 9 in total), But I always defaulted back to IE as my main browser, although i use a few others for various reasons and applications. The only one I won't tolerate any more is FF - that thing is too invasive. Srewed up everything last time. I guees I'll have to settle for the "low income" group - LOL.

PS: I like the FF Wallpapers though.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

This isn't a flame war, more like some friendly jousting (so far anyway). And yes, I agree with you . . . the choice of browser is much like the choice of AV. It's just a matter of 1) What you're comfortable with, and 2) What "plays well" with the other stuff on your system.

BTW, how can a browser be more "invasive" then IE, which is embedded in the system?

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
whs
whs
Posts: 10183

Well, at the time I had 6 browsers. When I installed FF3, it took over everything in sight. All the nifty shortcuts I had in my AppLauncher using all different browsers (for a reason) now all of a sudden were all FF. And when I unistalled FF, they all became Opera (beats me why) - but originally they were IE7, Safari, the World Browser, K-Meleon, - and some were Opera too. So the damn FF damaged my system setup even after being sent to hell. And resetting everything in the AppLauncher is a lot of work. So from now on, FF is on the blacklist.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
BobJam
BobJam
Posts: 876

Understand . . . had I had a similar experience I would have put whatever browser messed up my system on a blacklist too.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
ScottW
ScottW
Posts: 6609

I also don't want to start or continue a browser war, but I have to agree with Bob that IE is *the* most invasive that a browser can be. Firefox is available in a portable version -- that means NO installer, no hooks into the OS, and so on. You could run it from a USB flash drive and leave no "droppings" on your system. IE can't do this -- it can't even be separated from the OS! At least if Firefox causes trouble, you can uninstall it. Where's the uninstaller for IE? Where's the portable version? These are rhetorical questions.

It nice that other browsers come in portable versions, too. It's the only way I would test a new browser because there is no way I want to experiment on my primary system with an unknown app. Sure, I could make a Ghost image and restore later, but I might lose other changes made during that time. I always prefer the portable version of an app whenever one is available.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 
whs
whs
Posts: 10183

ScottW, I have a slightly different definition of "invasive". A program that sits quietly on the disk and does not do anything as long as I don't call it, is ok - even if it came packaged with the OS. The ones I hate are those that drag all kinds of stuff behind (as default) when being installed. Safari and Bonjour is an example (other Apple programs have the same habit) or a lot of others that install Google or Yahoo toolbars as default. And if one does not watch out like a police dog unchecking little boxes during installation, all this stuff ends up on the system. Worse even like FF, that takes over the whole setup if you don't watch it. If I install program X, I expect the vanilla version of program X and not a lot of other junk. If I want additional stuff, they can always put it into their "Tools" or "options" section.
Other "invasions" I do not like are programs that constantly update their stuff and many times require a reboot after the update. Adobe and AOL are good examples for that.

Posted 7 months ago #
Top
 

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.

Our Friends
Getting Started


About How-To Geek
What Is That Process?
svchost.exe
jusched.exe
dwm.exe
ctfmon.exe
wmpnetwk.exe
wmpnscfg.exe
rundll32.exe
wfcrun32.exe
Ipoint.exe
Itype.exe
Wfica32.exe
Mobsync.exe
conhost.exe
Dpupdchk.exe Adobe_Updater.exe

Copyright © 2006-2009 HowToGeek.com. All Rights Reserved.