I had posted part of this on another thread (http://www.howtogeek.com/forum.....?replies=7) and took the suggestion of the original poster and started my own thread essentially because I hijacked his.
jmcguire in the original thread had said that "non techy users will almost always use IE". And I would reply that a lot of non techy users switch to Firefox just because someone they think is computer savvy (a neighbor or "friend") says they should because they think it's more secure. He also says that "a very large user base of IE are non-techies". I would reply that "a very large user base of FIREFOX are non-techies". "Firefox users have to actually download the program" . . . so does that imply that those with the ability to do downloads are tech savvy?? If that's the case, then my 90 year old grandmother is tech savvy.
(I know I got sarcastic in my last comment there, but I really would like to have a good lively {AND CIVIL . . . certainly NOT implying that jmcguire has not been . . . on the contrary, she/he HAS been} discussion about this. And I think jmcguire is reasonable and civil, and wants the same thing . . . so I don't mean to be abrasive or abusive here.)
Firefox was at one time justifiably noted as more secure than IE. But as Firefox gained in market share, more and more malware writers focused on Firefox exploits, 'till now it has a lot more holes than it was publicized as having at one time. Nevertheless, Firefox still benefits from the rep it had a few years ago. A lot of users still maintain that it's the best browser because it's so secure (NOT anymore) and bash IE7. While IE7 still has a lot of holes, it has improved it's security and Firefox's security has declined. Some people insist that Firefox has the security level it once had, when indeed it doesn't. Firefox may be more secure than IE7, but IE7 is gaining on it rapidly. But some Firefox proponents are pretty testy about all this (I anticipate some comments on this . . . no flames, please), blindly insisting that Firefox is invulnerable. I have some friends that use Firefox and they are arrogant and close-minded about it.
And another thing that Firefox users are vulnerable to (is this turning into a rant on Firefox??) . Since they mistakenly think that Firefox will take care of security concerns, they let their guard down and are susceptible to malware attacks. The same can't be said of IE users . . . since IE has a rep for poor security, IE users will try to compensate by having tighter security.
There's sort of a Catch-22 with the security patches Microsoft is always coming out with. Yes, there are a lot of exploits on Windows, but then it has the biggest market share, so what do you expect?? If Linux had a bigger market share (and Firefox is actually getting more market share) then I bet the malware writers would focus on Linux more, and there would be more Linux exploits.
