<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>How-To Geek Forums Topic: Moving the paging file to the datapartition</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</link>
<description>How-To Geek Forums Topic: Moving the paging file to the datapartition</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:31:03 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>bamsan on "Moving the paging file to the datapartition"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/moving-the-page-file-to-the-datapartition#post-25361</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 05:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>bamsan</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25361@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;If you have two harddisk, I'll suggest you to create a stripe set instead. Then you don't need to worry about 'which stuff should go into which part'&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However, for daily &#38;#38; normal usage, I doubt that you'll notice any significant improvement
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Geek on "Moving the paging file to the datapartition"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/moving-the-page-file-to-the-datapartition#post-25358</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Geek</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25358@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;What you should look at in either process explorer or task manager is the Page Faults and virtual memory size for your processes. If you have applications that generate a lot of page faults, then you'd probably get somewhat of a speed increase from switching the pagefile.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Page faults are what happens when an application requests memory that is in the pagefile. For a confusing explanation: &#60;a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_fault'&#62;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_fault&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>whs on "Moving the paging file to the datapartition"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/moving-the-page-file-to-the-datapartition#post-25345</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 02:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>whs</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25345@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi Geek, First thanks for the answer. Both the OS disk and the datapartition disk have the exact same specs. Adding more RAM won't help with 32bit - I already have 4GB's. Should I do it given those additional details? I have, of course, no idea about the paging behavior of my applications. But I usually do nothing extravagant. My current page file is 6877MB.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Geek on "Moving the paging file to the datapartition"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/moving-the-page-file-to-the-datapartition#post-25344</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Geek</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25344@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Most of my tech buddies recommend doing this, as long as the other disk is comparable in speed. It can definitely increase speed if your applications do a lot of paging... although the best option is always to add more memory.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>whs on "Moving the paging file to the datapartition"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/moving-the-page-file-to-the-datapartition#post-25336</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>whs</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">25336@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I contemplate moving the paging file to my datapartition (which is a seperate physical internal 250GB disk). Right now I only use this partition for backing up with Ghost. Does anybody have experience with moving the paging file to a disk different than the OS disk and is there anything to be gained? Logic would tell you that it should speed up the system. But then reality may be different.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
