<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>How-To Geek Forums Topic: Another Vista SP1 article</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</link>
<description>How-To Geek Forums Topic: Another Vista SP1 article</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:31:30 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>whs on "Another Vista SP1 article"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/another-vista-sp1-artical#post-13034</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>whs</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13034@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;jd and Geek, I think you are both right. There is a lot to be said for Windows and Vista. At 55 MLOC it is amazingly stable. With the IBM OS/370 we figured 1 bug per 1000LOC (that was in the 60s to 80s). I think Vista is a lot better than that. But, as jd said, with the new SP1 code new bugs have to be expected. That's why I believe that letting it age a little does not hurt. Only crazes drink Beaujolais Nouveau and pay a lot for it, the connaisseurs wait a couple of years.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Geek on "Another Vista SP1 article"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/another-vista-sp1-artical#post-13013</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>The Geek</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13013@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Unfortunately it's popular to bash Windows Vista, so most columnists are going to bash it as much as possible to appeal to their audience.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Much less is said about the problems upgrading Ubuntu... every time I have to upgrade it takes me at least a day to get everything working right again... &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;There were a lot of problems with the latest OS X upgrade... but it's not as popular to bash those.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;When you consider the nearly unlimited hardware configurations that Windows runs on and the amount of software out there that runs on Windows, it's amazing that it works at all.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>jd2066 on "Another Vista SP1 article"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/another-vista-sp1-artical#post-13003</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 06:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>jd2066</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">13003@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I think that article was bit harsh.&#60;br /&#62;
SP1 may not have many things make people go wow but it does have a lot of fixes for bugs that have annoyed people.&#60;br /&#62;
Like:&#60;br /&#62;
1. Many performance problems have been corrected.&#60;br /&#62;
2. Many bugs that cause crashes have been fixed.&#60;br /&#62;
3. Little features like backing up Encryption Files and only defraging selected drives were added.&#60;br /&#62;
4. Reduced Functionality Mode has been removed. Now for people who's computers get deactivated due to a bug can still use their computer.&#60;br /&#62;
The article is also wrong about the UAC prompts. While a lot of prompts are still there it is worth noting that the amount of prompts in some situations are reduced.&#60;br /&#62;
&#34;SP1 reduces the number of UAC (User Account Control) prompts from 4 to 1 when creating or renaming a folder at a protected location.&#34;&#60;br /&#62;
Information From:&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href='http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_sp1_wga.asp'&#62;http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase/winvista_sp1_wga.asp&#60;/a&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
&#60;a href='http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071208/vista-sp1-changelog/'&#62;http://www.istartedsomething.com/20071208/vista-sp1-changelog/&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;@whs: That maybe true in some cases but I don't think so here.&#60;br /&#62;
Parts of Vista RTM are broke and SP1 fixes those things.&#60;br /&#62;
Unfortunately, SP1 does bring some bugs with it but that is unavoidable.&#60;br /&#62;
No one can write code without bugs as humans are not perfect.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Santo on "Another Vista SP1 article"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/another-vista-sp1-artical#post-12984</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Santo</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12984@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;From my past experiences.. I will never install any Windows updates for few weeks or even months. I agree what whs says. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;When the computer is working fine.. y do you have to install some thing that is not completely tested. MS wakes up only after the issues. So, wait and watch.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>whs on "Another Vista SP1 article"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/another-vista-sp1-artical#post-12978</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>whs</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12978@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Sounds like what we were expecting, doesn't it? I, for my part, will not rush into SP1. What is the old saying: &#34;If it ain't broke, don't fix it&#34;.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Smashpmk712 on "Another Vista SP1 article"</title>
<link>http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/another-vista-sp1-artical#post-12967</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Smashpmk712</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">12967@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Take the time to read. interesting problem the author had.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href='http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/edwardbaig/2008-03-12-vista-upgrade_N.htm?csp=34'&#62;http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/edwardbaig/2008-03-12-vista-upgrade_N.htm?csp=34&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
