http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ How-To Geek Forums Topic: Lost reliability monitor en Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:17:29 +0000 http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99958 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:34:58 +0000 LH 99958@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>And of course. If you click on Member, or Moderator, or whatever, under any members username, you can see their profile :) </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99954 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:16:47 +0000 cloche 99954@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>So you can guess what my second name is now. cheers </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99933 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:51:28 +0000 LH 99933@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>OK. I like you use the username "cloche". I live in France :) </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99923 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:11:03 +0000 cloche 99923@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Just logged On again and it is already up to date. I dont know who or what Trin is, so I guess thats a no. i am long since retired and a late newcomer to the computing world. thank you again </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99902 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:08:17 +0000 LH 99902@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>You should be good. But you know where we are :)<br /> Personal curiosity. Did you used to work for Trin ? </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99891 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:52:17 +0000 cloche 99891@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Thank you so much LH, I have done that, and EUREKA, I have a display on my reliability monitor. It has gone back to21 june, and shows up to 25 june and going no further at the moment, but I assume I may have to wait a while until it displays up to date. thank you very much this has been quite a saga and I have learnt a lot, but hopefully we may have cracked it, or am I being too optimistic cheers </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99880 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:41:38 +0000 LH 99880@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>In the Security Tab. Click "Edit". Then just go down the list (group or user names), and set each one to Full control. </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99876 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:18:07 +0000 cloche 99876@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p><a href="http://forums.techarena.in/windows-vista-performance/902371.htm" rel="nofollow">http://forums.techarena.in/windows-vista-performance/902371.htm</a><br /> I have just found this thread which appears to have solved my problem for some but I dont know how to do the middle bit of creating full control permissions for the local services.<br /> I can reset RAC ok. I tried ignoring the bit about permissions, and opened the command prompt but when I type in RACAgent and press enter nothing happens, anyone explain in simple terms how to do the permissions bit, as when I go to security tab I am lost. thank you </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99569 Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:47:44 +0000 cloche 99569@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>I have just remembered that I did a scan with eusing registry cleaner at about that time and it has a habit of taking a bit more out of my system than normal. I have restored the registry to the stat as before and I notice that the above system diagnostics are not stopped any more. I wonder if that is the cause of my problem. I will have to wait 24 hrs at least to see </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99549 Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:45:41 +0000 cloche 99549@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Well that has not cracked it. LH and scott what do you think of my observation that RAC_PS is disabled in start up event session, and does not appear in event session, also in SYSTEM LAN diagnostics,System diagnostics, System performance and wireless diagnostics are all stopped. These things mean nothing to me, but may to you. The link that scott gave me earlier showed an example where RAC_PS was Running in event session </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99235 Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:30:26 +0000 LH 99235@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Who knows. Windows works in mysterious ways (sometimes). </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99234 Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:27:17 +0000 cloche 99234@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Thank you. done. do you think that may do the trick. cheers </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99232 Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:21:22 +0000 LH 99232@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Set it to Automatic. </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor/page/2#post-99231 Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:14:20 +0000 cloche 99231@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>I have just been back into 'services', and the performance logs&#38; alerts was not started. I am sure I started it the other day[ See an earlier post], so I have started it again we shall see what happens </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor#post-98861 Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:55:06 +0000 cloche 98861@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p><img src="http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x310/colinb1604/Startupeventtracesessions.jpg" /></p> <p>Note the RAC_PS is disabled in startup trace sessions, and not listed in event trace sessions as per the eg you gave me. Do you think I should enable it </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor#post-98726 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:24:47 +0000 cloche 98726@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Thamk you, very interesting.I went into services as you suggest. Windows event log is enabled, performance logs was not started, so I have started it. I cant find alert services.Your book as you say is interesting. i thought it a bit over my head at first, but I am getting there. we shall see if performnce logs enablement makes any difference cheers. I have just noticed that performance logs and alert services are one item </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor#post-98710 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:32:45 +0000 ScottW 98710@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>I don't know that you have lost it forever. You just haven't found someone in me who can fix it. :-)</p> <p>I found <a href="http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vistaprograms/thread/860e0ef0-f908-40cf-8690-f5844488a89f/">this thread</a> that talks about the Services that need to be running. The ones that I guessed at, above, were not correct but I was right in thinking that there were some Services involved. I also found <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=-pFN-yLJgeIC&#38;pg=PA135&#38;lpg=PA135&#38;dq=RAC_PS&#38;source=bl&#38;ots=HHzn89__Pa&#38;sig=_VVTCa9JyyWbOpnD9kFFHFvLVTg&#38;hl=en&#38;ei=QjdXSuSxKoT6Mf_UzJ0I&#38;sa=X&#38;oi=book_result&#38;ct=result&#38;resnum=3">this book excerpt</a> which probably doesn't hold the answer, but has some interesting reading. </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor#post-98681 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:24:37 +0000 cloche 98681@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Well Scott, still nothing has appeared. Is there anything else we can try or have I lost it for good. Incidentaly, I notice if I go intodata Collection---Start up Event Trace Session, then an item called RAC_PS is disabled. Is that normal, Or not cheers </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor#post-98448 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:18:04 +0000 cloche 98448@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>Thank you, that makes sense, but they dont always work on logic, we shall see over the next day or so. cheers </p> http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/topic/lost-reliability-monitor#post-98445 Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:03:22 +0000 ScottW 98445@http://www.howtogeek.com/forum/ <p>I don't know exactly how it works. If each entry represents a day, then maybe it measures a certain block of time, such as 12:01:00 AM to 11:59:59 PM. Then you would need to wait more than 24 hrs to get the first result. </p>